Nuts and Bolts Standards Based Gradebook

I am going to be grading based on the standards this year in my Language Arts classes. I did some reading at this great blog called Think, Thank, Thunk . It got me really excited because some of the things I’m thinking of are things he wrote about. I really feel this will be cool!

But, the question I keep getting is, “But how are you going to put that in your gradebook?”

I think this is a great question and it’s the one that stopped me from doing this in the past. So, I’m going to try to answer that right now.

I’m not really sure.

I know it’s possible and I know others are doing it, but I haven’t found a concrete example of how to do it yet. Part of the problem is that our district mandates that we use the online Zangle gradebook. Well, it’s not really a problem, exactly. But, Zangle isn’t that flexible.

Let’s start with some basic ideas. First, grades are a representation of student progress toward mastery. An “A” says that the student has achieved an Advanced level of mastery. For a whole class, it would say that the student is proficient on all standards, at least and Advanced on many. A “B” says the student is Proficient, at least, on most, if not all standards. Some might be Advanced and some even Basic. But, overall the student is proficient.

And, so on. I think you get the idea. If not, post a question in the comments below.

So, a grade is not an average of points. We have to use points. Further, my department decided that 70% of the overall grade will be from summative assessments and 30% from formative assessments. I’m not happy about that but I’m going along with it (because I’m not a free agent, I’m paid to work as they tell me to and I don’t think this is particularly awful).

Looking at the Zangle gradebook, I notice that under Class Options setup (under Gradebook setup), there is a choice to calculate using points or percentages. I’m going to try percentages so I can weight the standards separately. The only reason I’m doing this is so I can put homework and quizzes in the formative category and give kids a score on those and thereby follow my district/PLC policy. Most of the homework in my class will be student postings in their blogs. I will allow them to revise their blogs and get better grades, if they want. Same thing with quizzes and informal tests. Students can try again to get better.

(A lot of teachers think this means students will all get A’s since they will all, naturally, re-assess until that happens. Not so, says Think, Thank, Thunk.)

Then, my plan is to put standards in where “assignments” would go. I will assign most to the summative category. Some of the “smaller” or more basic standards will go into formative along with homework.

Now, the rubber meets the road. Follow me for a bit on this one.

The first three weeks of my class are working on a unit on Rhetoric. We have to teach the students to identify rhetorical devices, specifically ethos, pathos, and logos. We have to teach students to identify figurative speech, like analogies. They need to be able to make reasonable assertions about the author’s viewpoint using elements of the text as evidence. They need to know how to critique the power, validity and truthfulness of arguments. Also, there’s some grammar, using knowledge of root words, and so on. So, I am going to take those standards and make them assignments.

When a student turns in a piece of work, I am going to have them write their name, the date, and their class period on the paper. Plus, they will need to put the standard they are submitting their work under and the unit number or name. That would look like:

Johnny Little
August 8, 2011
Period 1
Rhetoric Unit 1
Identifying Figurative Speech

I will “grade” the work and decide if it represents Advanced Mastery, Proficiency, Basic understanding, Below Basic, for Far Below Basic. Having done so, I will put a mark representing such in the gradebook under that standard.

Now, going back to the gradebook, I have some problems/questions. Right now, I’m leaning toward selecting “Assignment Results Displayed and Entered As Grade Values” and “Calculate Student Grades Using Point Calculation Method.” I’m not sure if this is right. I need to check with a math person to find out.

I added Assignment Categories, Formative and Summative. I assigned a weight of 70 to Summative and Formative got 30. I have no idea if this is right. I clicked submit and the percent of grade popped up 70 and 30! Success? Maybe. (If you don’t know, I have a pretty severe problem with numbers. It’s kind of a dyslexia with math. Not kidding. Those that know me will attest that numbers do stupid things when they get between my ears.)

Well, I Facebooked briefly with a math teacher from my school (thanks, Sean!) and he said calculating grades based on percentages was not a good idea, that I should use points instead. So, I switched it back to that.

Basically, I’m going to have to keep an eye on my grades and see that they come out right. Like I said, the goal is to have a grade on the report card that accurately reflects the progress toward the standards in the class. It kinda sucks that we have to boil it all down to a single grade on the report card, but that’s how it is right now. I think that this will, ultimately, be more fair in the long run, though.


4 thoughts on “Nuts and Bolts Standards Based Gradebook”

  1. I like this idea too! I really think the grades should be based on mastery of the standards. That is the way it is set up at the elementary level. Just curious, why do not like the 70% summative and 30% formative? How would you prefer it if you were a free agent? 🙂



  2. Thanks for reading, Amy! If I were a free agent, I would do all summative assessments and no formative. I think that formative assessments should be scored for feedback only and not recorded in the gradebook. I'm kinda getting around it by taking some of the more foundational standards and making them “formative” versus the more “summative” essays or other demonstrations of mastery. Great question, thanks!


  3. G.R.,

    I read the THINK, THANK, THUNK article and don't understand how to do the reassessment as it is stating, since as far as I understand it at my school we must do intervention and then give the EXACT SAME assessment. To me this means the students could just memorize the test.
    One of the teachers I'm working with is suggesting we give the formatives and allow reassessment on them, but not on the summative. I'm good with that. What I don't like though is that students may be given only one summative test on those standards and as the article states, they are never revisited until it's time for CSTs. As I writing this though, I'm coming up with my own answer which is to convince my PLC team to incorporate those standards into future formative or summative assessments, so that they are revisited and students can show me that they are retaining or finally mastering the standards and then I can adjust their grades accordingly.


  4. Hi Anonymous, thanks for reading! I am planning on allowing my students to reassess when and if they choose to do so. I think that author, Cornally?, also will reassess the kids himself to see that their level of mastery hasn't changed. I think that's not a bad idea. It sounds like you're figuring it out already, though. My policy is to allow retakes on summative tests, too. In fact, I would rather, as I said, not have formatives count in the grades at all.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s